Contact with chambers should be made through the Practice Management Team. They are happy to discuss client requirements and provide further information on such matters as the expertise and experience of individual members, fees, working practices and languages spoken. We have members able to work in French, German, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Swedish, Greek and Chinese (Mandarin).
Outside working hours, a member of our team is always available to be contacted on matters of an urgent nature. Contact should be made using the Chambers main number or email.
For our Singapore office, for client enquiries please contact our BD Director, Asia Pacific, Lara Quie and for all other queries please contact Lynn Quek. Out of office hours calls will automatically be diverted to our clerking team in London.
28 Maxwell Road
#02-03 Maxwell Chambers Suites
Singapore 069120
singapore@twentyessex.com
t: +65 62257230
Contact with chambers should be made through the Practice Management Team. They are happy to discuss client requirements and provide further information on such matters as the expertise and experience of individual members, fees, working practices and languages spoken. We have members able to work in French, German, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Swedish, Greek and Chinese (Mandarin).
Outside working hours, a member of our team is always available to be contacted on matters of an urgent nature. Contact should be made using the Chambers main number or email.
For our Singapore office, for client enquiries please contact our BD Director, Asia Pacific, Lara Quie and for all other queries please contact Lynn Quek. Out of office hours calls will automatically be diverted to our clerking team in London.
28 Maxwell Road
#02-03 Maxwell Chambers Suites
Singapore 069120
singapore@twentyessex.com
t: +65 62257230
On 12 February 2016, Arnold J gave judgement on the trial of the remitted issues in Actavis v Eli Lilly. In this multi-billion pound, multi-jurisdictional patent action, Thomas Raphael QC has been acting for Actavis as part of a multi-disciplinary team. His special responsibility has been the issues of private international law and commercial law that arose.
In his remission judgment, Arnold J found in favour of Actavis, concluding that Actavis’ pemetrexed diacid, dipotassium and ditromethamine products would not infringe the patent for “pemetrexed disodium” if their instructions prescribed dilution in dextrose rather than saline. He also held that Actavis was not precluded from launching by collateral letters which created no contracts or estoppels that could bind Actavis.