Contact with chambers should be made through the Practice Management Team. They are happy to discuss client requirements and provide further information on such matters as the expertise and experience of individual members, fees, working practices and languages spoken. We have members able to work in French, German, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Swedish, Greek and Chinese (Mandarin).
Outside working hours, a member of our team is always available to be contacted on matters of an urgent nature. Contact should be made using the Chambers main number or email.
For our Singapore office, for client enquiries please contact our BD Director, Asia Pacific, Lara Quie and for all other queries please contact Lynn Quek. Out of office hours calls will automatically be diverted to our clerking team in London.
28 Maxwell Road
#02-03 Maxwell Chambers Suites
Singapore 069120
singapore@twentyessex.com
t: +65 62257230
Contact with chambers should be made through the Practice Management Team. They are happy to discuss client requirements and provide further information on such matters as the expertise and experience of individual members, fees, working practices and languages spoken. We have members able to work in French, German, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Swedish, Greek and Chinese (Mandarin).
Outside working hours, a member of our team is always available to be contacted on matters of an urgent nature. Contact should be made using the Chambers main number or email.
For our Singapore office, for client enquiries please contact our BD Director, Asia Pacific, Lara Quie and for all other queries please contact Lynn Quek. Out of office hours calls will automatically be diverted to our clerking team in London.
28 Maxwell Road
#02-03 Maxwell Chambers Suites
Singapore 069120
singapore@twentyessex.com
t: +65 62257230
In Cottonex v Patriot, Hamblen J considered whether "invoicing back" provisions were incorporated into a contract for the sale of cotton. He held that they were not, and in so doing allowed an appeal brought by Cottonex under s.69 of the Arbitration Act 1996. The judgment deals with the approach to be taken to the question of what provisions are incorporated by reference into a contract. It also deals with the degree which "commercial good sense" is relevant to the construction of a contract. The judgment also considers whether a question of construction involving factual matrix remains a pure question of law (or is a question of mixed fact and law); the judge found that the former was the correct analysis. In addition, the judge considered the circumstances in which additional materials and fresh arguments may be relied upon by a respondent.
Charles Kimmins QC acted for the successful appellant (instructed by Holman Fenwick Willan LLP)